| Monograph : Agency Law |
Contents |
| |
| (6)
Agent's rights against principal under common law |
| |
| |
1. |
Right to remuneration |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| a. |
Under common law, an agent is only
entitled to remuneration for his services as an
agent if the terms of the agency agreement so provide.
|
| |
|
| b. |
Where the agency agreement does not
expressly provide for payment of remuneration to
the agent, and there is a dispute between the principal
and agent as to the right to claim any remuneration
and the amount and terms of payment of such remuneration,
the court may have to determine if, on the facts
of the case, there are any implied terms in respect
of the same in the agency agreement. |
| |
|
| c. |
In deciding whether there are any
implied terms in respect of any matters in an agency
agreement, the court will have regard to all the
circumstances of the case, such as the nature and
length of the services provided by the agent, the
express terms of the agency agreement, the customs
and practices of the profession or trade of the
agent, any previous course of dealings between the
principal and the agent, etc. |
| |
|
| d. |
In the business world, if services
are rendered by the agent and accepted by the principal,
there is often an implied term that the agent may
be entitled to reasonable remuneration for such
services rendered, even if there is no express agreement
for the payment of remuneration. |
| |
|
| e. |
Where it is expressly provided that
remuneration is payable upon the happening of an
event (for example, on successful completion of
a transaction), the agent is not entitled to claim
the remuneration until that event has actually occurred.
And if the event specified does not occur, the agent
will not be entitled to claim any remuneration even
if he has spent time and effort in trying to bring
about the event. |
| |
|
| f. |
Subject to any special terms in the
agency agreement, where the remuneration of an agent
is a commission on a transaction to be brought about
by the agent, the agent is not entitled to such
commission unless his services are the effective
cause of the transaction being brought about. The
real question is whether the agent's action and
services actually and directly bring about the contractual
relation between the principal and the third party.
The agent's action and services must not have been
merely incidental. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
2. |
Right to reimbursement and indemnity |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| a. |
Generally, an agent has a right to
be reimbursed by his principal for all expenses
and to be indemnified against all losses and liabilities
incurred by him in the performance of his duties
to the principal. |
| |
|
| b. |
When an agent carries out his duties
according to the principal's instructions and in
the course of which he incurs expenses, he is normally
entitled to reimbursement by the principal of such
expenses, as long as they are reasonable. Expenses
may include items such as travelling expenses, photocopying
charges, fees for registration of documents payable
to government departments, etc. |
| |
|
| c. |
An agent may not have a right to
reimbursement or indemnity in the following circumstances:
|
| |
|
| |
| i. |
If the act of the agent is
unauthorised and the same is not subsequently
ratified by the principal; |
| |
|
| ii. |
If the agent is negligent
or otherwise in breach of his duties under
the agency agreement; or |
| |
|
| iii. |
If the act carried out by
the agent is unlawful. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
3. |
Right of lien |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| a. |
Subject to any statutory provisions
to the contrary, an agent who is in lawful possession
of goods or chattels belonging to his principal
has a right to retain possession of them until payment
by the principal of the agreed remuneration or reimbursement
of the agent's reasonable expenses. This is generally
known as a right of lien. |
| |
|
| b. |
The right of lien exists only if
the goods or chattels have been lawfully obtained
by the agent in the course of the agency and that
such goods or chattels have not been delivered to
the agent with express directions, or for a special
purpose, inconsistent with the right of lien. So,
for example, if a piece of equipment is delivered
to the agent by the principal with the express instruction
to the agent to deliver the same to a third party,
the agent is not entitled to claim a lien on the
equipment. |
| |
|
| c. |
The right of lien is normally restricted
to a right of possession of the goods or chattels.
It confers no right on the agent to sell, charge
or otherwise dispose of the same. |
| |
|
| d. |
The right of lien may also be exercised
by an agent in respect of products produced or documents
prepared by the agent on the instruction of the
principal. |
|
|